ORLANDO INDUSTRIAL7.2%+0.4%
MIAMI MULTIFAMILY$3,420+1.2%
TAMPA RETAIL4.8%-0.2%
US-192 CORRIDOR$340/SF+4.1%
30Y FIXED MORTGAGE6.72%-0.08%
FED PROBABILITY (PAUSE)92%+2%
ORLANDO INDUSTRIAL7.2%+0.4%
MIAMI MULTIFAMILY$3,420+1.2%
TAMPA RETAIL4.8%-0.2%
US-192 CORRIDOR$340/SF+4.1%
30Y FIXED MORTGAGE6.72%-0.08%
FED PROBABILITY (PAUSE)92%+2%
ORLANDO INDUSTRIAL7.2%+0.4%
MIAMI MULTIFAMILY$3,420+1.2%
TAMPA RETAIL4.8%-0.2%
US-192 CORRIDOR$340/SF+4.1%
30Y FIXED MORTGAGE6.72%-0.08%
FED PROBABILITY (PAUSE)92%+2%

What is the difference between the SB 328 (2024) 120-day review and the SB 1730 (2025) provisions?

SB 328 (2024) established the mandatory 120-day administrative review period, the clock that starts when a developer submits a complete LLA application and after which the application is deemed approved by operation of law if the municipality takes no action. SB 328 also expressly prohibited quasi-judicial review and closed the FAR restriction loophole. SB 1730 (2025) added the 10-story standard height ceiling (with exceptions for areas where the one-mile height match produces a higher entitlement), the 10% commercial cap on non-residential space, the expanded parking reduction (15% within half a mile of major transit), the one-moratorium-per-three-years rule for municipalities, and the hardened attorney fee recovery provision (clarifying the $250,000 cap applies per project and is triggered by any improper action, not only express rejection). Together, all three bills (SB 102, SB 328, SB 1730) create the complete legal framework. An LLA application submitted today relies on all three layers simultaneously.